MENU

Sections

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy

More

  • Support the Spy
  • About Spy Community Media
  • Advertising with the Spy
  • Subscribe
May 8, 2025

Chestertown Spy

Nonpartisan and Education-based News for Chestertown

  • Home
  • About
    • The Chestertown Spy
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising & Underwriting
      • Advertising Terms & Conditions
    • Editors & Writers
    • Dedication & Acknowledgements
    • Code of Ethics
    • Chestertown Spy Terms of Service
    • Technical FAQ
    • Privacy
  • The Arts and Design
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Public Affairs
    • Ecosystem
    • Education
    • Health
  • Community Opinion
  • Donate to the Chestertown Spy
  • Free Subscription
  • Talbot Spy
  • Cambridge Spy
3 Top Story Arts Delmarva Review

Delmarva Review: The “Best of” Anthology

December 7, 2024 by Delmarva Review Leave a Comment

Share

A notable new literary anthology, The Best of Delmarva Review 2008 – 2023, has been released for circulation worldwide in print and e-book editions. 

“The anthology showcases ‘the best of the best’ short stories, poetry, and nonfiction published in the Delmarva Review during its 16-year history,” said Wilson Wyatt, the executive editor and one of the founders of the literary journal.

The 450-page collection contains a treasure trove of the most compelling writing by 75 authors. Many are from the greater Chesapeake-Delmarva region. In all, they come from 18 states, the District of Columbia, and one from Scotland.

“The anthology is three books in one, organized into poetry, fiction, and nonfiction sections,” Wyatt said.  “Each section is like a small book introduced by an interview with the editors highlighting why they chose the poetry and prose. The reasoning for their choices are like ‘writing gold’ for aspiring writers, and they add thoughtful considerations for our readers.”

Over its history, the Delmarva Review has published the best new poems and stories from 550 writers. They have come from 47 states, the District of Columbia, and 19 foreign countries and represent the publication’s dedication to exceptional writing. Over 100 have been nominated for Pushcart Prizes and other national awards. Some have been recognized in “best of” anthologies or received public acclaim from literary critics, editors, and other publishers.

The Delmarva Review’s editorial staff is composed entirely of experienced volunteers, including professors from universities in the tri-state area. They have read the thousands of submissions to the journal each year. Publication in the Delmarva Review is regarded as a literary achievement.

In addition to the review’s annual journal, it partners with Spy Community Media to publish selected content weekly for large regional audiences of new readers. The result is both national and local recognition for the writers’ work. 

The Delmarva Review’s editorial board operates as a team. It includes Bill Gourgey, managing editor and publisher, from  Washington, DC, poetry editor Anne Colwell, of Milton, Delaware, poetry assistant editor Katherine Gekker, of Alexandria, Virginia, fiction senior editor Harold O. Wilson, of Chester, Maryland, fiction coeditor Lee Slater, of Norfolk, Virginia, nonfiction editor Ellen Brown, of Duluth, Minnesota, Gerald F. Sweeney, book review editor, of Easton, Maryland, and Wilson Wyatt, executive editor, of St. Michaels, Maryland.

The anthology’s cover pictures a great egret with its wings spread to take off. The photographer, Wilson Wyatt, calls the photo “Taking Flight.” He says the image is a visual metaphor for the author “taking flight” to new destinations of opportunity.

 As an independent, 501(c)(3) nonprofit literary publisher, the journal has received  financial support from individual tax-deductible contributions and public grants from Talbot Arts, with revenues from the Maryland State Arts Council. 

The Best of Delmarva Review 2008-2023 is available in paperback (print) and e-book editions from major online booksellers and some regional specialty bookstores. For more information, see the website: www.DelmarvaReview.org. 

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Delmarva Review

Delmarva Review: Leitmotif by Rita Plush

November 30, 2024 by Delmarva Review Leave a Comment

Share

Editor’s Note: “Leitmotif” was first published in Volume 16 of the Delmarva Review in 2023 and was selected to be featured in the new anthology, The Best of Delmarva Review.

Author’s Note: My daughter and I had breast cancer at the same time. Hers was more severe than mine and she didn’t survive. Writing, putting things on paper always helps me understand how I feel about something. “Leitmotif” did that for me.

Leitmotif

DURING A MOMENT of afternoon delight my husband discovered a lump in my breast. After an all-clear mammo two months prior—so much for regular screening. Yet even with a lumpectomy that left my boob scarred and mangled, he still thought I was sexy. 

I waltzed—maybe two-stepped— through twenty-five rounds of radiation and continued working throughout. A month later, my arm swelled to twice its normal size. Lymphedema. A chronic condition that blocks the body’s liquid flow. Per protocol, I donned a compression sleeve and glove and religiously massaged and exercised my puffed-up appendage. Within months, no swelling. This disease can return at any time but since my surgery nine years ago, it has not.

I have been lucky on all fronts. A little humor there. But I need it; if I don’t laugh, I’ll cry. 

About my daughter. 

A year or so before my cancer, Leslie, not yet 50, engaged to be married, suffered a double mastectomy and breast reconstruction, her fiancé by her side every step of the way. She too was lucky in love. But not in cancer. 

From the get-go her numbers weren’t good. Out went her uterus to prevent the disease from spreading to there. She put herself on an exercise and healthful eating regime; she took prescribed drugs, endured infusions. For six years, cancer threw in bowel, kidney, and heart problems. Her hair went, but not her will. She left herself open to trials like a mouse in a lab. 

We would talk about her cancer, her various treatments, her worries—one of which was burdening me with her illness. What is a mother for if not to be burdened by her child’s distress? My cancer? I didn’t talk about it in anything more than a cursory way. There wasn’t much to say. I’d had my surgery and whatever action was called for; I was well. 

Time has a way of filling in the blanks, of opening the past to a wider lens. Maybe it was because I was in such good health and she was challenged every day with some new catastrophe, that I felt guilty bringing it up. In hospital rooms of drips and pumps and monitors beeping, I stayed strong for her and gave of myself. Did I say all the right things? There’s a funny! Not on your life! There were times I asked too many questions about her treatment: “When I want you to know, you’ll know!” Other times, not enough: “Don’t you care?!” So there’s that. 

Folks talk about “going forward” and “moving on” after a great loss, as if they got themselves a better job, or found a new love after a breakup. Me? Did the sun rise in the morning and set before dusk? The very cosmos might have rearranged itself and the opposite may have been true. I was frozen, benumbed with grief. I could not think. I could not feel. A part of me, a big part, had died with her. There! I said the d word! “Passed on,” folks like to say. It sounds less final than “died.” Has a more graceful ring to it, don’t you think? As if she had gently floated off to some ever-lovely world, free of pain and disease. Died is so… dead!— one year now. (Pfft, and she was gone, as with the wave of a magician’s wand.) 

I see my friends now. I’m knitting again. The other day I rolled out my yoga mat. I’m a phone friend to a shut-in; like clockwork, five on Friday, I call her, and we chat for an hour. Just this morning an idea for a short story popped up. I may even take in a movie this afternoon. Leslie loved the movies. Maybe I’ll give her… No, I won’t give her a call, will I? (Lapses of memory, I have them now and again.) But I keep on. And Leslie, my precious child, her loving smile, and bulletproof spirit, her “Tell me everything!” is keeping right along with me. A life-giving undersong to my each and every day. 

♦ 

Rita Plush (New York) is the author of two novels, Lily Steps Out and Feminine Products, and a short story collection, Alterations. She is the book reviewer for Fire Island News and has been a guest on The Author’s Corner on Public Radio. Her stories and essays have appeared in Alaska Quarterly Review, MacGuffin, The Iconoclast, The Sun, Kveller, Jewish Week, Broadkill Review, Backchannels, LochRaven, Avalon Literary Review, Chicken Soup for the Soul, and Sanctuary Magazine. She is from Queens, New York. Website: www.ritaplush.com.

The Delmarva Review has been published annually from St. Michaels, Maryland for sixteen years. Its editors selected the most compelling new poetry. creative nonfiction, and short stories from thousands of submissions nationwide (and beyond) for publication in print and electronic editions. At a time when many commercial and literary magazines have closed their doors or reduced literary content, the review has stood out to help fill the void in print. Selection has always been based on writing quality. Almost half of the writers have come from the greater Chesapeake-Delmarva region.  As an independent literary publication, the review has never charged writers a reading or publishing fee. The Delmarva Review is available worldwide from all major online booksellers. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, support comes from tax-deductible contributions and a grant from Talbot Arts with funds from the Maryland State Arts Council. Website: www.DelmarvaReview.org.

 

 

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Delmarva Review

Delmarva Review: Arrogance by Katherine J. Williams

November 23, 2024 by Delmarva Review Leave a Comment

Share

Editor’s Note: This is one of Katherine J. Williams’s poems included in the new anthology, “The Best of Delmarva Review 2008-2023,” to be released during the holidays.

Author’s Note: As children, whatever we observe becomes our definition of the world. Sometimes it takes years to understand the unacknowledged power of early assumptions. The significant losses I experienced colored my understanding of my life in ways I didn’t notice. Louise Glück’s words (which became the epigraph for my poem) were a wake-up call for me.  

Arrogance

        Someone like me doesn’t escape.  Louise Glück

Peeking out from under our Norway Spruce
at the reign of siblings in a kingdom not my own,
or walking with my hand on the metal arm
of my mother’s wheelchair while others danced ahead,
it felt as though I lived in a land apart.
The day my young husband died
on a dingy sidewalk in New York, I recognized the territory.
Someone like me doesn’t escape became an answer
to a riddle I didn’t try to solve. The dailiness of couples,
the ease of others in the world—foreign currency I couldn’t spend,
and a strange comfort in this recognition.
But here I am at eighty, still standing, in a barely peopled field.
How could I have thought myself especially marked?
How not notice this brilliant living loneliness?

⧫

Katherine J. Williams, Associate Professor Emerita at The George Washington University, has published in journals such as Poet Lore, Passager, Broadkill Review, Delmarva Review, and anthologies such as The Widow’s Handbook, How to Love the World and The Wonder of Small Things. Several of her poems have been nominated for the Pushcart Prize. Her debut poetry collection, Still Life, was published by Cherry Grove Collections. Website: katherinejwilliamspoetry.com 

The Delmarva Review has published annually from St. Michaels, Maryland for sixteen years. Its editors have selected the most compelling new creative nonfiction, poetry. and short stories from thousands of submissions nationwide (and beyond) for publication in print, with an electronic edition. At a time when many commercial and literary magazines have closed their doors or reduced literary content, the Review stood out to help fill the void in print. Selection has always been based on writing quality. Almost half of the writers have come from the greater Chesapeake-Delmarva region.  As an independent literary publication, it has never charged writers a reading or publishing fee. The Delmarva Review is available worldwide from Amazon, other online booksellers, and specialty regional bookstores. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, support comes from tax-deductible contributions and a grant from Talbot Arts with funds from the Maryland State Arts Council. Website: www.DelmarvaReview.org.

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Delmarva Review

Delmarva Review: A System of Seeing by Colin Jeffrey Morris

November 16, 2024 by Delmarva Review Leave a Comment

Share

Author’s Note: “A System of Seeing” recomposes John James Audubon’s proposal to the New York Lyceum of its collaborative investment in a book project that would eventually become– with largely British sponsorship—his masterpiece, The Birds of America. My poem amplifies the vocabulary of “vision” and “correspondence” that makes its music on the margins of the predominantly transactional pitch of Audubon’s original letter. It belongs to a sequence of twenty poems (and counting!) that treats episodes, encounters and images in Audubon’s ruthless pursuit of a transcendent “system” of seeing.

A System of Seeing

      J.J. Audubon to the president of the New York Lyceum

My Plates are a rifleman’s
captures more than  

ornithological charts,
yet no feature demanded 

by science is denied
in them or overlooked.  

My watchfullest pictures
encompass some seventeen 

subjects or more; a hawk
mauling a flock of great 

grouse-hens; a robin’s nest
stormed by a snake. 

Your best fellows might
lend prudent comments, 

each naturally bearing
their name. Correspondence 

should then fill the vision,
each page spreading 

the imprint of God. Then
will this book open a region 

and increase our love
of the birds.

⧫

Colin Jeffrey Morris’s sequence-in-progress poems on Audubon have recently appeared in descant, Lily Poetry Review, and The Ekphrastic Review. He was born in Liverpool and raised on the Lancashire coast of England. Morris lives in Berkshire County, Massachusetts.

The Delmarva Review has been published annually from St. Michaels, Maryland for sixteen years. Its editors selected the most compelling new poetry. creative nonfiction, and short stories from thousands of submissions nationwide (and beyond) for publication in print, with an electronic edition. At a time when many commercial and literary magazines have closed their doors or reduced literary content, the Review has stood out to help fill the void in print. Selection has always been based on writing quality. Almost half of the writers have come from the greater Chesapeake-Delmarva region.  As an independent literary publication, the review has never charged writers a reading or publishing fee. The Delmarva Review is available worldwide from major online booksellers, and specialty regional bookstores. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, support comes from tax-deductible contributions and a grant from Talbot Arts with funds from the Maryland State Arts Council. Website: www.DelmarvaReview.org

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Delmarva Review

Delmarva Review: The End of the Story by Patty Somlo

November 9, 2024 by Delmarva Review 1 Comment

Share

Author’s Note: After my husband was diagnosed with terminal cancer, I believed I was preparing for his death. “The End of the Story” weaves together this period of caregiving, mixed with fear and love, with my work as a writer, who often has trouble ending stories.

The End of the Story

A NOT FAMOUS WRITER who nevertheless publishes a fair amount, I am sometimes interviewed about writing. One question comes up more often than not. “What is the most difficult thing you find about writing?”

My answer is always the same. “I have trouble finding an ending.”

And so it is with life. Or at least it is with my life in the present moment. The best story of my life recently came crashing to a halt. I’m now stalled in front of a massive concrete wall. At the moment, I don’t see any place I can go. Heading back the way I’ve come is impossible. Going forward, or even to the left or right, won’t work. The only word to describe my situation is stuck.

My husband, partner, friend, and really, everything, has moved on. I wouldn’t say he abandoned me, as that has the ring of intention. In truth, my husband wanted to stay with me forever, far longer than the nearly three decades we were lucky enough to form a twosome. He struggled to live for four and a half years, while cancer fought hard to take him out. If I said cancer won, such words would imply that Richard lost the fight. It’s impossible to imagine anyone gliding over the obstacles this horrid disease put up as gracefully as Richard did, until the end, when he just as gracefully bowed out.

A loved one’s long serious illness can make you believe you’re preparing for when he or she is gone. I thought this, especially since I knew the end of the story. We’d received the first news on an April evening, in a call from Richard’s doctor, following an MRI. My husband had lesions in his spine, probably metastatic tumors, the cause of his persistent back pain and the result of a cancer in its advanced stage. At that point, I feared my husband was going to die right then and there, or at least in the coming week. As the story I’ve partially revealed makes clear, he survived. For four and a half years, he continued to live. Yet for four and a half years, I knew how the story would end. I just didn’t know when.

I am not an optimistic person. My usual thinking borders on the hopeless and bleak. If I were a character in a famous novel, I would be Mrs. Bennett in Pride and Prejudice. Like Mrs. Bennett, I almost daily need to tend to my nerves. As also happens to my literary double, a small bit of bad news can throw me into a tizzy. Worse news, such as a stage four cancer diagnosis, turns me into a sobbing mess.

Surprising to me, I did not take to my bed for four and a half years, as Mrs. Bennett would have done under the circumstances. I was Richard’s sole caregiver, which meant I had no choice. He was the person I loved most in the world, devoting himself to staying alive. That made me a partner in this race, in which we did everything possible to outrun cancer cells trying to overtake the healthy ones left.

A pattern emerged as Richard and I traveled the road of his illness. Some crisis would appear—a fracture in his spine, intense digestive issues, cancer moving to his brain—and I would sink way down. Not only could I imagine the worst, but I also let him know this terrible fate was on the horizon. But in a few hours or a day, I would unearth some slender thread of hope and follow it to a place that hadn’t existed for me before.

I went on as if reading a novel in which we’re told in the first chapter that the main character is soon going to die. In preparation, I did all the practical things. Like most married couples, Richard and I split household and other chores, each handling what we liked and were good at. Gradually, I convinced Richard to let me do things he’d always handled, such as paying bills. As time went on, he took it upon himself to teach me what I didn’t already know—how to open the safe or where he kept his passwords.

I understood that I probably couldn’t prepare for the emotional trauma the loss of my husband would cause. But at least I would be ready to take over the mundane everyday tasks.

Still, as his condition worsened and we feared the every-three-weeks treatment wasn’t working as well and one day would not, I imagined I was getting ready. He slept a lot, appearing for breakfast, and then returning to bed. Weeks wore on, and he started to sleep even more. Alone much of the time, I thought, Well, this is what it will be like when Richard is gone.

Earlier in my life, stories seemed to emerge nearly whole. Tales I wrote were short, two thousand words, no more, and came out of me like I imagined an infant would, if I’d ever had children. In those days, I didn’t search for endings. They arrived naturally, as if the story could end no other way.

Two years into my husband’s illness, when COVID shuttered everything in our small city, for the first time I found myself writing longer stories. Many days, I searched without luck to find resolutions to those tales. It was as if the unchecked malignant cells in Richard’s body and the Coronavirus spreading everywhere had seeped into my pen.

At the same time, I spent hours each day alone with my thoughts, worrying about the latest crisis or concerning symptom that might only be a side effect but also a sign of the impending end. Over and over again, I calculated how many more weeks or months Richard might live. I worried and worried and worried, and then would try tricking my doomsday mind with a bit of mindfulness, reminding myself that what would happen was out of my hands and worrying wouldn’t change that.

Every writer has heard one piece of advice—Write what you know. Since my beginnings as a creative writer after a decade as a fact-writing journalist, I have written about what I want to know. In other words, I write to learn. Beforehand, I don’t know the characters and their stories. I write about them to find out more.

I knew almost nothing about cancer before Richard’s diagnosis. Though I fretted endlessly about his dying and how soon that terrible event would occur, neither Richard nor I cared to ask his oncologist for a prognosis. We chose instead to take each day, week, and month as it would come, to make the most of his time, rather than cross off each day on an abbreviated calendar and see how few days of his life were left.

At the urging of a social worker in palliative care, I joined a caregiver support group, two years into Richard’s cancer treatment. The group met once a week on Zoom. Monday mornings, I stared at all these strangers’ heads and listened to their voices, frequently relating truly terrible ordeals. The worst stories came from people caring for loved ones close to death. There was talk of twenty-four-hour care by husbands, wives, and children not trained to be doctors, nurses, or nursing home aides, yet suddenly thrust into those roles. One wife hadn’t left her bed for two years, having been in hospice all that time. Another partner needed more oxygen every day than the provider was willing to supply. The stories were wrenching and frightened me more than I was ready to be that scared. I thought, what a mistake I had made agreeing to join this group. Instead of helping me, I felt far worse when I turned off my laptop at the end of each group.

I’m not sure why, but I hung in there. My reason for doing so might have been because I listened to a voice in my head that said, Eventually, these people will be able to help you.

In addition to outlining horrors at the end of life and the toll that can take on the person doing most of the caregiving, members of the group offered resources, easier ways to do this or that, along with helpful products. They shared the adoration they felt for their patients. Most important, they let me know that more than anything, love would power me through the hardest times.

I started to see the end of the story in the caregiving group, though I still didn’t know how or exactly when my story with Richard would end. Group members were caring for loved ones with a variety of serious illnesses, but most who had died were suffering from stage four cancer. One of the many lessons I learned about a life ending from cancer was that the last days often arrive without warning, as if someone snuck in and suddenly flicked the switch from on to off.

As much as I feared this shift happening to Richard, I couldn’t help seeing it in every new crisis. An MRI done on his neck after he injured his shoulder and arm trying to lift a heavy weight, what he used to do easily at the gym before cancer robbed him of energy and strength, showed a tumor at the base of his brain. The next day a subsequent MRI of the brain revealed two more. This is it, I thought, before learning that targeted radiation could destroy the DNA in those cancer cells without a bit of damage to the surrounding healthy tissue.

Six months later, Richard suddenly started speaking in nonexistent words. I panicked, asked him what was wrong, and when he couldn’t tell me, I called 9-1-1. In seconds, burly firefighters and paramedics crowded into the hall of our small ranch house, checking out my poor confused husband, while shooting rapid-fire questions at me. As I waited to see Richard in the emergency room, I kept thinking, This is it. Finally able to go to his room, I was relieved to find that he could speak normally again. The doctors had no idea of the cause for what they labeled temporary aphasia.

A few weeks later, following a more precise series of MRIs, we learned Richard had even more brain tumors. And yes, I assumed this was where he would now take the rapid turn, hurtling him to his final destination. But once again, I was wrong.

As a prolific writer of short fiction, I’ve learned the essential technique of foreshadowing. Because I almost always write to discover the story, rather than plotting the tale ahead of time, I often need to go back and add hints of what I know is to come when the piece concludes. Looking back on the progression of Richard’s illness, I can see that, yes, the appearance of the first brain tumor was one of many signs in his final year foreshadowing the end coming not far behind.

Yet we held on to hope. In the three and a half years before brain tumors were discovered, every seemingly life-ending crisis had resolved. With the second appearance of even more brain tumors, the kind, excessively smart and cheerful radiation oncologist assured us following the treatment that he’d gotten every single one.

Yet, I couldn’t ignore the fact that Richard’s condition was worsening. Numbers that used to go down on his tests following chemo were climbing to levels we had never seen. Also rising was his pain, prompting the need for more and more medication. His weight, on the other hand, was dropping, even at times when his appetite reappeared, and he ate more. He was also sleeping a good part of the day, eventually spending more time asleep than awake.

If I had been writing a story of someone dying from cancer, I might have realized the ominous changes signaled the end was near. In real life, though, people are complicated. Richard wanted to stay alive. He also used every ounce of his diminishing energy to hold onto some semblance of a life. A landscape photographer who loved traveling to beautiful places in nature, whether on day trips or longer stays, he still found ways to use one of his many cameras to make memorable prints. Every so often, he would muster up the energy to take a walk with me around the neighborhood, his camera tripod doubling as a walking stick. Some afternoons, he only had enough strength to step out to the backyard, photographing our delicate old roses, then making prints inside, even matting, framing, and hanging them on the wall.

The life Richard gripped so fiercely helped me push the end of his story further into the future. Many days I would remind myself of how long the spouses of other caregivers survived after entering hospice. Since Richard hadn’t moved into that end-of-life care, I assumed he would go on that same amount of time.

We knew, though, that whatever time he had left was growing shorter. As his energy diminished more and more, the one place left where he had the strength to venture out was the backyard.

Without any planning, Richard and I started a daily ritual of coming together in the late afternoon outside. We each sat in one of the black wicker chairs set beneath the fig tree. By this time, Richard’s bones were destroyed from the cancer that had found a home there early on, which made sitting hard. To ease the discomfort, he would place an oversized cushion down on his chair.

In our meetings under the fig tree, we began, without prior agreement, to prepare for the end of the story. Each day, one or the other of us would start. Initially, we spent those precious afternoons reminiscing about the wonderful life we’d shared, mostly recalling favorite trips and hours spent outdoors.

The look back on our life turned out to be the prelude. Before long, we eased into talk of what would happen when Richard was gone. More than once, he asked if I would be all right. Each time, I assured him that though I’d relied on him in our years together, I could manage on my own. That did not mean, I made clear, I wouldn’t be sad and miss him forever, which I would.

We next eased into Richard’s future, which, as we agreed, was far more uncertain. He admitted to being afraid, mostly of what would happen before he died. He worried most about the pain of dying, and that no amount of medication would ease it.

And of course, he feared what would happen after death. I told him again and again that I believed he would be in a better place, where the pain and all the terrible side effects had finally vanished.

On a sunny and warm fall morning, Richard died. In the days before he took his last breath and his heart stopped, he seemed to move on, barely getting out of bed, as if he realized life as he’d known it was done. The end of the story I’d dreaded for four and a half years had come, and sorrow washed over me, an enormous wave under which I felt I might drown. Worst of all, the man who had comforted me through so many hard times was now gone.

If ghosts exist, since Richard’s death I have acquired one. He is friendly, like Casper, who I adored as a child. I hear him around midnight in the hall and assume, like Richard, he is walking to the kitchen, where he’ll grab a ripe banana from the basket I keep on the top shelf.

My ghost hovers over the bed where Richard spent so many hours in his final months. This friendly spirit lets me talk to Richard and cry, letting him know I’m sad, but I’m also doing all right.

The ghost and these early days of widowhood have taught me one thing. When it comes to a great love, there is no end to the story.

Isn’t that, I ask myself, what Jane Austen taught us in Pride and Prejudice? Even after Elizabeth Bennett made it clear to Mr. Darcy that she would rather swallow sharp knives than marry him, he couldn’t give her up, no matter how hard he tried.

So today I will walk to the backyard and take my place on the black wicker chair to the left of the small matching side table. I will turn my chair slightly to face Richard’s chair and the towering redwood tree in my neighbor’s yard. In those moments, I will contemplate the upcoming chapters of my life, which has always been unpredictable, in both its high points and times when the road has headed decidedly down.

♦

Patty Somlo, from California, has published four books and three short story collections. She has won numerous writing awards including a Notable selection for Best American Essays, several nominations for a Pushcart Prize and Best of the Net. Her books include: Hairway to Heaven Stories, The First to Disappear, and Even When Trapped Behind Clouds: A Memoir of Quiet Grace. Somlo was a reporter before focusing on literary fiction and creative nonfiction.

The Delmarva Review has published annually from St. Michaels, Maryland for sixteen years. Its editors have selected the most compelling new creative nonfiction, poetry. and short stories from thousands of submissions nationwide (and beyond) for publication in print, with an electronic edition. At a time when many commercial and literary magazines have closed their doors or reduced literary content, the Review stands out to help fill the void in print. Selection has always been based on writing quality. Almost half of the writers have come from the greater Chesapeake-Delmarva region. As an independent literary publication, it has never charged writers a reading or publishing fee. The Delmarva Review is available worldwide from Amazon, other online booksellers, and specialty regional bookstores. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, support comes from tax-deductible contributions and a grant from Talbot Arts with funds from the Maryland State Arts Council. Website: www.DelmarvaReview.org

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Delmarva Review

Delmarva Review: Something More Than Winter Weighs (Upon Me) by John Muro

November 2, 2024 by Delmarva Review Leave a Comment

Share

Author’s Note: A constant source of inspiration for my poems remains, unabashedly, the natural world. Nature so often provides for poetic inspiration, insight and restoration of the soul and the creative spirit. Sometimes, too, it provides a sacred space to simply reflect upon memories and key events in our life that still affect us in some way. The poem was written after a walk in winter at a time when I was thinking about the many people, including friends and family, who were once such integral parts of my life experience. The bleakness of that day seemed to reinforce a sense of isolation, the temporal nature of life and, strangely enough, it also seemed to increase the weight of anguish — and regret — inside me. Hence, the title of the poem.

Something More Than Winter Weighs (Upon Me)

Slowed by missteps and an unshakable
grief, I’m approaching the trail’s end,
watching the waning light dust the top
of the tree line where a few solitary
leaves of Klimt gold flutter like torch-
lights set atop the crowns of beech,
while a flock of juncos, shaped like
lateral buds, seem to blur and bend
the low-hanging branches, noting
how even the wind’s weighted, too,
with woodsmoke and rank with
leaf decay. In the further field,
snow, as soft as fly ash, is swept
across the thin, translucent icing
of the pond, adhering to the edges
of tombstones leaning away from
wind and much too close to earth,
and I pause to consider how all
seems to be near or at an ending
and so take on the season’s muted
hues of heart-sore gray, and I see
what little light is left to this day,
knowing, too, that I’ve done few
things well in this life and that it
is not so easy to displace loss, or
cast aside regrets or to somehow
ease the even greater weight of
those I still carry deep inside me. 

♦ 

John Muro’s work has been nominated three times for a Pushcart Prize and two times for the Best of the Net Award. He is also a 2023 Grantchester Award recipient. John has published two volumes of poems, In the Lilac Hour (2020) and Pastoral Suite (2022), and both are available on Amazon. A third book, A Bountiful Silence, is slated for publication in the near-term. John’s work has appeared in Acumen, Barnstorm, Connecticut River, Grey Sparrow, New Square, River Heron, Sky Island and the Valparaiso Poetry Review. He lives in Connecticut and remains a lover of  the arts and of all things chocolate.    

The Delmarva Review, published in St. Michaels, MD, selects the most compelling new nonfiction, fiction, and poetry from thousands of submissions nationwide (and beyond) for publication in print, with an electronic edition. It is produced  at a time when many commercial  publications (and literary magazines) have closed their doors or are reducing literary content in print. Selection is based on writing quality, and almost half of the writers have come from the Chesapeake region.  As an independent literary publication, it has never charged writers a reading or publishing fee. The review is available worldwide from Amazon, other major online booksellers, and specialty regional bookstores. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, support comes from tax-deductible contributions and a grant from Talbot Arts with funds from the Maryland State Arts Council. Website: www.DelmarvaReview.org

 

 

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Delmarva Review

Delmarva Review: Unknowable by Mary-Cecile Gee

October 26, 2024 by Delmarva Review Leave a Comment

Share

Author’s Note:  My mother died in my arms when I was in my early forties. She wanted to die at home, and my sister’s and my willingness to be her caregivers made that possible. Over the arc of my mother’s final weeks, she only uttered a rare few sentences, but each one took up resonance in my heart as my teacher. One of those sentences was a question she asked of me days before she took her last breath. It is the true center of this piece—the answers to which are both lastingly unknowable, and not.

Unknowable

ONCE, AFTER HEARING A SINGER’S lyrical lament that the angels might turn their backs on some—and what a mystery it would be, if so—I read an entire book on the history of angels in the hopes that I would find an answer to this riddle. When, indeed, would an angel turn its back on any of us? 

In that history, I found the intricate map of a celestial hierarchy arranged in a circular triad—closest to the circle’s center are the Seraphim, Cherubim, and Thrones; then the Dominations, Virtues, and Powers; at last, there are the Principalities, Archangels, and Angels. None of these beings are the sweet nothings we now associate with our conception of angels. They are matterless, purportedly voiceless beings charged with duties that they never predictably fulfill. (Who knew?) Those that find their job descriptions involve an interface with humanity, and with Earth, are too often seduced by evil and lastingly corrupted. 

When they make themselves visible to us, the Seraphim have four heads and six wings covered in all-seeing eyes; the archangel Michael had one hundred and forty wings. Wings to cover head, back, feet, face, and genitals. (Apparently, angels have genitals.) The mystery, as it turns out, was no mystery, just some measure of ignorance on my part; clearly angels could turn their backs on us as suddenly and for as many reasons as we might turn our backs on them. 

What remains with me is the vision at the center of their circular triad: “an unknowable center point which is called God…an emanation of pure thought of the highest vibration…” Around the unknowable center, the Seraphim ceaselessly chant, “Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh–Holy, Holy, Holy…” This monotonous activity is described as a possible “song of creation…the primary vibration of Love”. The frequency of this “pure thought” changes its vibratory speed as it travels in subtle waves away from the center, coalescing into “pure light” in the second triad, before wholly condensing into matter at the outer reaches of the orbiting rings. It is here that you might find all of us—hovering and bustling around our unknowable center. 

In my life, I embrace no hierarchies nor are there celestial and circular triads, though surely, I have caught glimpses of some unknowable center. Around me at my desk gather traces of those glimpses—rings of images, clippings, hand-written notes, letters—held close by the gravitational pull of my life. I find brown sugar packets marked Istanbul Modern. A purple post it with ATC/NPR 1.22.07 written on it above “Iraqis tattoo their phone numbers on their bodies so someone can be called in case of their deaths.” On the back of a plain American Almanac calendar sent to me annually by my chronically suicidal high school friend, intricate first aid instructions for shock; artificial respiration: mouth-to-mouth; convulsions; heart attack; snakebite; poisons; burns. A pamphlet entitled A Flower Seed Planting Table for the Middle South, in whose legend it says, “T  is for tender; H is for hardy; HH is for half-hardy.” A chart that lists “the Number of Shrubs or Plants for an Acre calculated by their Distance Apart”—for plantings three by three inches apart, there is room enough for 696,960 plants. An old Altoid box filled with thousands of small typed HAs, individually snipped out from a larger piece of paper, and dropped into the container’s emptiness. There is Bruce’s Christmas card from 1997—a black- and-white universal signage symbol of a man blowing his brains out with a pistol, an empty cloud of smoke drawn in just where 

the pistol meets the universal man’s temple, all of it printed within a dark gray circle with a diagonal line drawn through it indicating Don’t! Jane’s first xoxo letter written in a vertical hand on a cream-colored sheet of paper crowned by a Japanese print of a woman bearing a lantern. A spherical lead fishing weight adrift on my desk from several years of experiments surrounding the design of my “Weft Removal Machine”. A mini article extracted from the Herald-Tribune, whose headline reads “Melted stalagmite leaves Hindu pilgrims dismayed.” My mother’s watch, which is always one hour slow, no matter how often I reset it, just as it was when she was alive. The announcement for a show entitled The Last Photographs—imagery by a man named James Fee who, believing his fixer to be his fifth of scotch while working in the darkroom, took a deep swig of it under the red light and died. An image of my friend John Lilly, emaciated from leukemia and wearing his favorite fake pearl-encrusted pink fifties sunglasses, giving a manicure to the fiberglass fingernails of a Jonathan Barofsky mini-man under our pepper-dripping tree. The script for a Yoko Ono painting entitled Painting to See the Skies that reads, “Drill two holes in a canvas. Hang it where you can see the sky. (Change the place of hanging. Try both the front and the rear windows, to see if the skies are different.) 1961 summer.” 

And then there are three portraits of my mother—when she is in her fifties (as I am), ambitious and striking and bold; when she is sixty-nine, in her first week of chemo, and she is thin, distilled, facing out toward us, but facing the abyss within; when she is seventy-one and just a year from her death, her face is fluffy with its sense of fun and with the chemo, but she looks into the camera at me as if there is nowhere she would rather be and no one she would rather be with. I rely on this image to keep me riveted to my joy, and not to my sorrow. 

Of course, the unknowable center can never be named, but I would venture to say that the vaguest form of it—its luminous self—slipped into my consciousness just days before my mother’s death when she asked me, “Do you have to stop loving to die?” 

♦ 

Mary-Cecile Gee holds a BA from Sarah Lawrence College and an MFA in studio-arts from California State University, Fullerton. Gee attended the Community of Writers (in the High Sierras), studying with C.J. Wright, Sharon Olds, Mark Doty, and Robert Hass. Gee is a Buddhist Chaplain at the “no-barriers” Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center. She is a dedicated visual artist. Website: marycecilegee.com 

The Delmarva Review, published annually from St. Michaels, MD, selects the most compelling new personal essays, short stories, and poetry from thousands of submissions nationwide (and beyond) for publication in print, with an electronic edition. It is produced  at a time when many commercial  publications (and literary magazines) have closed their doors or are reducing literary content in print. Selection is based on writing quality, and almost half of the writers have come from the Chesapeake region.  As an independent literary publication, it has never charged writers a reading or publishing fee. The review is available worldwide from Amazon, other online booksellers, and specialty regional bookstores. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, support comes from tax-deductible contributions and a grant from Talbot Arts with funds from the Maryland State Arts Council. Website: www.DelmarvaReview.org

 

 

 

 

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Delmarva Review

Delmarva Review: Traumas by Andrew Payton

October 18, 2024 by Delmarva Review Leave a Comment

Share

Author’s Note: I find it a terrifying thrill that as a parent I am responsible not just for a child but a childhood, and whether or not she remembers these days with love or venom, the days proceed. Even my best self with my best intentions make mistakes. And yet, there is so much sweetness, whenever I follow her lead and look.

 

Traumas

My daughter learned from a goat
that there is sweet sap to be sucked 
from honey locust pods in early autumn.

She takes the fibrous capsules to her mouth 
with ecstasy—mmm, she sighs—inciting horror 
in mothers who watch from the swing set. 

My wife fears the traumas we bequeath. 
Traumas like mountain ranges submerged 
under flat lakes: some will surface 

as islands of visible grief, but most will lurk 
and stub a paddling toe or wreck a canoe 
out for a pleasant float. My wife says 

she pushed her away from her body,
says she was done being consumed 
before our daughter was done consuming, 

reads that crying to sleep etches abandonment 
into the brain. Graduated extinction, they call it, 
as if an absence can be tempered, as if the child 

knows the night as anything but complete. 
The pericarpal flesh, if you’re unfamiliar,
is a viscous goo sinewed with woody threads: 

delicious, my daughter states, spitting 
marble-black seeds into the playground mulch, 
reaching to pluck another from the branches. 

 

♦ 


Andrew Payton is a writer, learning designer, teacher, and climate advocate living in Harrisonburg, Virginia with his partner and children. His writing has appeared in The Chicago Tribune, Alaska Quarterly Review, Poet Lore, Rattle, among others, and he won the James Hearst Poetry Prize from North American Review. Born and raised in Maryland, he is a 2014 graduate of the MFA program in creative writing and environment at Iowa State University. Website: andrewdpayton.wordpress.com 

 

The Delmarva Review, published in St. Michaels, MD, selects the most compelling new poetry. fiction, and nonfiction from thousands of submissions nationwide (and beyond) for publication in print, with an electronic version. It is produced  at a time when many commercial  publications (and literary magazines) have closed their doors or are reducing literary content in print. The review is available worldwide from Amazon.com, other major online booksellers, and specialty regional bookstores. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, support comes from tax-deductible contributions and a grant from Talbot Arts with funds from the Maryland State Arts Council. Website: www.DelmarvaReview.org

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Delmarva Review

Delmarva Review: Chopin’s Ghost by Bethany Reid

October 12, 2024 by Delmarva Review Leave a Comment

Share

Author’s Note: As a child I took piano lessons, but they left me only with a life-long aversion to the piano. When I retired from full-time teaching, I decided to see if I could get over that aversion. My introduction to “Chopin for Beginners” in 2020 led me to reading a biography of Chopin (whose times were filled with war, pestilence, and discord, like our own), and from there—inevitably, for me—to writing a series of poems about the composer, pianos, and music. 

Chopin’s Ghost

“The joy of reading appears to be the reflection of the joy
  of writing, as though the reader were the writer’s ghost.” 

       —Gaston Bachelard  

I’m reading Chopin’s letters from 1830.
He’s in Paris and, homesick for Poland, goes into a library
and finds a book titled, Chopin,
“a pretty large volume, elegantly bound.”
It’s a book about his music,
with copies of his variations in his own hand.
“This is an absurdity worth remembering,”
he writes home. I have a sense
of my own absurdity, reading Chopin
reading Chopin, with a strange awareness
of him, as if he stood at my shoulder.
It’s October and the light has turned sideways,
so thin as it slivers through the blinds.
The piano of my childhood was an upright
of mahogany. Once I opened the lid
and found a doll resting on top of the strings
and hammers. I left it there
and played my scales and little songs
with a frisson of something akin to terror,
as if a ghost accompanied me. 

♦ 

Bethany Reid’s stories, essays, and poems have recently appeared in One Art, Poetry East, Quartet, Passengers, Adelaide, Kithe, Descant, Peregrine, and Catamaran. Her fourth full-length collection of poems, The Pear Tree: elegy for a farm,  won the 2023 Sally Albiso Award from MoonPath Press. Reid, from Washington state, blogs about writing, reading, and life at http://www.bethanyareid.com.

The Delmarva Review, published in St. Michaels, MD, selects the most compelling new poetry. fiction, and nonfiction from thousands of submissions nationwide (and beyond) for publication in print, with an electronic version. It is produced  at a time when many commercial  publications (and literary magazines) have closed their doors or are reducing literary content in print. Selection is based on writing quality, and almost half of the writers have come from the Chesapeake region. The review is available worldwide from Amazon.com, other major online booksellers, and specialty regional bookstores. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, support comes from tax-deductible contributions and a grant from Talbot Arts with funds from the Maryland State Arts Council. Website: www.DelmarvaReview.org

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: Archives

Delmarva Review: Dry Eye by Jean McDonough

October 5, 2024 by Delmarva Review Leave a Comment

Share

Editor’s Note: Jean McDonough’s personal essay, Dry Eye, was nominated for a Pushcart Prize in Nonfiction and was selected for inclusion in the forthcoming anthology “The Best of the Delmarva Review.” 

Author’s Note: While I was suffering from the effects of a chronic dry eye condition during the last few months of my father’s life, I often felt emotionally detached from him. It wasn’t until I turned my attention to the weeping woman in Pablo Picasso’s Guernica, as well as the testimonies of those who suffered during the Spanish Civil War, that I was finally able to express my sorrow.

Dry Eye

I SEE GHOSTS. I see them early in the morning and late at night when restless spirits shift between life and death. I see ghosts in the bright lights of oncoming traffic and through the branches of trees that sway back and forth in the wind. They lurk behind the shivering words in books and mirror the shadow hands of clocks. These ghosts that I see—with their undefined boundaries between the living and the dead—exhaust me. I want them to go away. Fortunately, at least, I only see them with my left eye and the cause is not life-threatening—not a brain tumor, stroke, or aneurysm, for example—as is often the case with these sightings. 

My optometrist calls my ghost sightings double vision, or— in my situation where I only see ghosts with my left eye— monocular diplopia. When I complained about these visions a few years ago—the year I returned home from Spain only to find the edges of everything blurred and my father months from death—my eye doctor focused a high-intensity light on the surface of my left eye and discovered something that he had never seen in one of his patients. I had developed a dividing line—a deep aberration—across the center of my cornea, that once clear and now fragile window into my soul. This aberration—a failure of light rays to converge at a single focal point because of a defect in a mirror or lens—appears as a wrinkled ridge on the surface of my eye. It completely spans my field of vision, in effect giving me a ghost image or doubling of everything I perceive, despite my strong prescription for nearsightedness. Essentially, I have a textbook case of cornea damage that affects my sight and is the result of chronic dry eye disease. There is no cure for this affliction that I developed in middle age, though—strangely—it is something that I recognize having always endured in a similar way, even as a young child. I have always viewed the world differently. 

EVENTUALLY I LEARNED to live with the idiosyncratic right side of my brain—the creative side that naturally dominates my thinking and controls the left side of my body, including my left eye—the side where I understand life best through metaphor, the comparison of one thing to another in order to identify their similarities. I am more compassionate because of these parallels that I see in otherwise uncommon things, but I am also more sensitive and prone to depression. Life is much easier when there are clear lines that divide one thing from another, and so the left side of my brain—that rational and logical part of my being—has always worked hard to correct the erratic and unpredictable thinking of my right side. It corrects the double vision of my flawed left eye and the tendency that I have toward metaphor. It wants to see everything with crisp edges, absolute boundaries, and insurmountable border walls between countries. In a fraction of a second my brain receives images from both my eyes—one flawed and the other normal—processes them, and then creates for me a three-dimensional awareness of my surroundings where I perceive length, width, and depth so that I can determine where I exist in the world. 

During this process, the ghost images of my left eye are mostly suppressed by my more dominant right eye—the logical side—and so I can manage through life without too much of a problem. I can still drive a car. I can usually read a book and thread a needle. Except on a few rare occasions, I move through life without bumping into the corners of tables or stumbling down the stairs. I can pour hot coffee without worrying I will miss my cup and spill on the table. I can even survive for years without seeing the similarities between two otherwise very different things, such as my dark childhood and Pablo Picasso’s Guernica, the famous painting about a city that was destroyed during the Spanish Civil War. 

In essence, I can effectively blend into a crowd. 

GHOSTS SURROUNDED ME even before I developed dry eye disease. When the priest presiding over my baptism poured water on my head as a newborn, I am told that I did not cry out in fear, but most likely my neural cells—the cells of my brain responsible for receiving sensory input from the external world—were already dividing in an unusual way; eventually I would see the duality of most things in life. Water would become for me not life through baptism, but death: the cold glacial lake in which my uncle accidentally drowned and the quiet river in which my aunt intentionally drowned herself. Water filled and overflowed the sink basins of my obsessive-compulsive mother who cried without ceasing and was unable to stop washing her hands. It is probably no surprise, then, that in the few remaining photographs of my baptism, we are all double-exposed. My mother stands next to my father, tightly cradling me—she was still willing to touch me at that point—as if I were about to pass through a wall or float away in my long white sheath. In these double-exposed photographs—a phenomenon that once occurred with old cameras where film would fail to properly advance after exposure to light, resulting in two different images overlapping on the same frame—we are all ghosts, which is to say that we are ourselves, but then something else that is a harbinger for death. 

WHILE I COULD GIVE all sorts of other examples of my double vision, I will focus on the weeping woman in Pablo Picasso’s Guernica, the haunting masterpiece that reflects the death and destruction of the Spanish Civil War. I have chosen to focus on this painting because, at the time that I viewed this masterpiece in Spain, my father began to die, and—in that moment of witnessing the weeping woman in the corner of the canvas—the edges of my life and his death blurred. I found myself bumping 

into corners and stumbling down the stairs in this strange country where even a painting seemed more real to me than all the unfamiliar emotions I was experiencing. I needed to find a place, a thing—anything—where I could safely feel these emotions, and so Guernica, with its exploding bombs, broken bodies, and ghostly figures trapped in burning buildings, became my refuge. 

ON APRIL 26, 1937, during the Spanish Civil War, the Basque city of Gernika was attacked by German and Italian aircraft as a show of support for the military revolt led by Francisco Franco against the legitimate Republican government. In little more than three hours, the small town of Gernika was leveled to the ground by incendiary bombs. Internationally condemned as one of the first aerial attacks against innocent civilians, the event inspired Pablo Picasso to paint Guernica. Joseba Elosegui, a survivor of the bombing, recalls his experience when he helped a distraught woman whose home had just been destroyed by the sudden assault on their small town. 

I ran into a woman covered with dust and with dingy hair who couldn’t say anything but, “My son, my son.” She dragged me to a pile of ruins that had been her house. I started to work furiously to take away the stones and heavy beams. I scratched my nails until I broke them. Bombs were falling but I didn’t pay any attention to them. I only felt the presence of that woman behind me. She would not let me rest. Then I found the child. He wasn’t more than three years old. I touched his clothes. My hands came back covered in blood. It was still hot. Finally I removed the body. It was broken and lifeless. I raised him toward the mother. For many years I have been seeing that woman’s eyes. She took her son and emitted a horrifying shriek. Then she disappeared among the ruins, carrying the dead boy. (See Smallwood, 2012) 

ANOTHER EFFECT of my chronic dry eye condition is that I often experience tears streaming down my face in the morning. Because my eyes are not receiving enough lubrication in the thin hours of dawn—the hours when ghosts frequently roam—they send distress signals through my nervous system. In response, my brain floods my eyes with emergency tears. These fake tears, though—like those of weeping stone statues or professional mourners hired at funerals—are not productive. They neither heal my soul nor coat the surface of my eye with nourishment because their composition is primarily water and lacking the necessary oils for proper lubrication; a healthy tear film is constructed of three complex layers: fatty oils, aqueous fluid, and mucus. I also lack the vital mucus that helps spread tears across the surface of the eye, as well as specific proteins that reduce the likelihood of infection. Because of these deficiencies, I experience none of the nourishing richness of normal tears that allow humans to fully express their emotions. 

Even though I am no longer able to cry real tears, I still do everything that I can to soothe my dry eyes. I store bottles of artificial tears in nearly every room of my house and use them like vials of holy water to ward off evil spirits. I stay hydrated and frequently consume seafood high in omega-3 fatty acids, such as raw tuna and grilled salmon. During the dry winter months, I run humidifiers and hover over pots of boiling water. I practice guided meditation to ease eye strain and apply lavender oil to my tender trigger points. While I am at work, I take frequent breaks from computer screen time and try to remember to blink. In every aspect of my life—as a matter of course—I rely on my insatiable desire for knowledge, believing that it gives me an edge on the human condition; if I can understand the complexity of my emotions through the chemical composition of human tears, for example—with all their enzymes, lipids, metabolites, and electrolytes—then, perhaps, I will not need to feel them. 

When each one of these interventions fail—as is often the case when my sight narrows and my perception of time collapses—I quietly and discreetly decrease the interval between acceptable doses of pain medication, but nothing curbs the migraines. Behind my closed bedroom door and alone from the demands of life—alone in a room of my own—I close the curtains. Then I gently lay warm compresses across my eyes to calm my central nervous system—or is it my hurting soul that I need to soothe?—because it is now critical that I accomplish two objectives in direct opposition. I must in a single fleeting moment—that millisecond between stimulus and response— replicate the richness of authentic tear production while also dulling—even deadening—all sensory perception, and so I cannot possibly feel anything more; I am bedridden. 

These repressed emotions that I have from a lifetime of sightings—all the tenuous overlap of life and death, all the ill- defined borders of metaphor merging to a single focal point in my field of vision—are so powerful that I cannot easily regulate their flow. It is easier to not allow them at all, and so the emergency response of my nervous system comes at a high price. 

I am no longer able to cry. 

IN A SMALL DARK ROOM, I remove my eyeglasses and carefully place them on my lap. My doctor instructs me to lean forward in the chair until I can comfortably rest my chin on the plastic cup of my optometrist’s phoropter, a steel and glass instrument used to determine refractive error in eyes and the corresponding prescription. My hands are cold and clammy. My breath is shallow. I cover my right eye with the handheld occluder—a black plastic patch effectively blocking messages to the logical left side of my brain—and attempt to focus on the blurry black-and-white images on the other side of the room. 

My doctor slides a corrective lens in front of my flawed left eye. 

He asks me which is clearer. 

One? 

Then he slides a different lens in front of my eye. It clicks into place. 

Or two? 

When I hesitate—ghosts now overwhelm my field of vision and I am afraid, but the tears will not come—my doctor tries again, his voice softer and slower this time. He is patient with me, sensing a struggle. He sees that I am on the edge of panic. I can no longer differentiate between what is real and what is a ghost image. I can no longer determine what is real and what is metaphor. Perhaps my doctor should ask me a different question. 

How do you best express your emotions? There is life and there is art.

Which is sharper?

One? 

Two? 

I tell him to do it again.

IN PICASSO’S GUERNICA, there is the unmistakable agony of the mother holding her dead child. The weeping woman raises her head to heaven in bitter accusation. God—grown indifferent to human sin and suffering—recalls his promise. He will never again drown the earth with his tears. He will never again unleash the floodgates of heaven to destroy every living thing with anger, sorrow, and vengeance. The woman collapses on the ground with no one to weep with her in the darkness. In the chaos of broken bodies and burning buildings, in the disorienting smoke that blinds her vision, the woman’s ghost sightings are coming at her so quickly and so intensely now—all those ill-defined borders between life and death—that they will not let her rest. She desperately wrings her stinging eyes until they are painfully twisted, but her tears refuse to fall. If those tears were to fall— the tears of the weeping woman—they would drown every living thing on earth. When the mother sees that the eyes of her dead child are without light, she can only hold her son in her arms and emit a horrifying shriek. Then she disappears among the ruins, carrying the dead boy. 

MY MOTHER DID NOT CRY when her brother drowned in a boating accident. Instead, she filled the basins of sinks with stagnant pools of water that originated from some deep well, a dark place where her brother still gasped for air in the underworld. Then she wailed and wept over the things that did not matter to her soul, and—attempting to control her grief with the turn of a lever—washed her hands until the skin on her fingers fell away in shreds. My mother sobbed while scrubbing—with dish soap and scalding water—car keys, tennis shoes, hairbrushes, and screwdrivers, but then wrapped her feet in plastic bags when she showered. If I placed a toy that she considered unclean around her vinyl placemat on the dining room table, she wept inconsolably and so my mother rarely touched objects directly; most of the time she placed a paper towel—cold and damp from her nervousness—between her hand and a chair or table. Other than in the photographs of my mother holding me as a tightly swaddled newborn, I do not recall her ever touching me, even with a paper towel. She often wailed and wept if someone greeted her with an embrace and, once—during an encounter with my grandmother—emitted a series of horrifying screams before disappearing into the bathroom to wash her hands. 

When my quiet aunt—who saw things that no one else could see—walked from her mental institution into a river, she never returned. My mother, though, did not cry when her sister drowned. Instead, she doubled her efforts to remove all that death from her hands, scrubbing farther and farther up each arm until she reached the bony bend of her elbow. Mineral deposits from our hard well water—all those calcium and magnesium flakes— appeared like newly fallen snow around the perimeter of our sinks. The plumbing of our house clogged with so much soap scum—so many tears festering in the bottom of basins—that my father had to call a professional to clean out the pipes so that our water could properly drain. 

All those displaced tears, though—the ones that my mother cried when she faced overwhelming tasks, such as assembling my school lunches, retrieving a dish towel that had fallen on the floor, or rescheduling an appointment—were not the authentic tears that richly nourish the soul. It is probably no surprise, then, that as my mother grew older, the challenges of her life became insurmountable. She remained in the bathroom when her mother was near death and then later refused to attend her funeral. Many years later, after I returned from Spain and my father was near death, my mother again disappeared into the bathroom to wash her hands. Even though I sat at my father’s bedside each week and begged my mother to visit him, I was unable to influence her behavior. My mother only left the house to visit her husband twice during the last six months of his life, despite having been married to him for over fifty years. Then, when my father finally died, she refused to attend his burial. Instead, she spent the day washing her hands. 

WHEN PICASSO COMPLETED Guernica in 1937, the artist had a private showing of the painting for more than a dozen friends and artists in his Paris studio. While the group stood in reverence before the black-and-white mural, Picasso repeatedly approached Guernica, and—with a flair for the dramatic—removed from the painting small pieces of red paper shaped like drops of blood falling from the eyes of his anguished characters, including the weeping woman. While it is unclear why Picasso performed this theater, he may have been trying to illustrate the fickleness of human emotion. Perhaps the artist understood that humans are sometimes limited in their capacity to express emotion, especially in moments of great crisis, and certainly during war. 

Whatever the artist’s motivation, Picasso continued to remove the teardrops—each at a time and place of his choosing—until only one remained under the eye of the infant that was cradled in the arms of his mother, the weeping woman. When the artist finally removed the last tear from Guernica—that red drop of blood beneath the eye of the dead child—the audience burst into applause. Spanish writer José Bergamín later asked Picasso if he wanted to permanently adhere the paper teardrops to the black-and-white figures in Guernica. Instead, the artist decided to discard all of the tears except one that he saved in a small box. Once a week, Picasso and Bergamín took the box to the World’s Fair Exposition in Paris where the painting was displayed in the Spanish Pavilion. Each day of their visit, they temporarily placed that single drop of blood below the eye of the bull as it coldly disregarded the weeping woman and her dead child. 

MY FATHER WAS that rare AB negative type, and so the American Red Cross called him every few months to request a blood donation. He did this with both pride and a sense of urgency as he rolled up the sleeves of his plaid flannel shirts. Perhaps he remembered as a small child the endless streams of wounded World War II soldiers requiring transfusions to restore the light in their eyes. Perhaps he believed that giving blood was a civic duty. Whatever the motivation, when my father gave blood to people in need—those suffering from car accidents, gunshot wounds, botched surgical procedures, or other circumstances when it was no longer possible to contain the body within its boundaries—he did this without expectation of receiving anything in return. 

When my father came home from donating blood, he always wore a bandage on his arm and a round white sticker on his shirt that contained a small red teardrop. The sticker usually said something like “Giving blood saves lives,” or “Proud to be a blood donor.” Sometimes my father would give me his blood donation sticker, and I would press it against my chest. Even though these stickers never stayed on my clothes for very long— eventually curling and falling to the floor while I played around 

the house—they were important to me as a child. They helped me believe that my father actually cared about people. 

 

YEARS LATER WHEN I was still living at home, my father’s mother suffered a series of strokes, sudden blood clots that abruptly restricted the flow of oxygen and nutrients leading to her brain. My grandmother’s circulation was eventually so severely impaired that she was bedridden during the last few months of her life and eventually died of gangrene. I only know this—not from visiting her at her bedside like most families do when one of their loved ones is near death—but from a series of answering machine messages that the long-term care facility left for my father. 

Every week they called him with a short update of my grandmother’s condition, but my parents would never answer the phone. My father would listen disinterestedly to the messages at the dining room table while he straightened his knife and fork or took a sip of water from his glass and swished it around in his mouth to dislodge food stuck in his teeth—but he never returned the phone calls from the nursing home. When each answering machine message ended, he would toss his head back and swallow—one at a time—the line of pills that he had carefully laid out on his napkin. 

Because my parents had no interest in friends and had estranged themselves from our family, when the phone did ring at our house, the individual who was trying to reach them was usually only a telemarketer selling an extended warranty, a dental office receptionist, or an automobile repair shop. My parents never picked up the phone when it was ringing, even when they were in the same room. Instead, they would wait for the answering machine to record each disembodied voice, including my own as a grown child when I lived miles from home. Then later, at a time and place of their choosing, they would return the phone call. This usually happened the next morning in the comfort of their easy chairs, but sometimes—in the case of my dying grandmother—never, and so the phone calls from the long- term care facility grew more and more urgent, each confused voice begging my father to visit his mother before she died. Eventually, the nursing home left one final message regarding the condition of my grandmother, and—a few days later—my father attended her funeral. 

A FEW MONTHS AFTER viewing Pablo Picasso’s Guernica in Spain, my father died. He lingered in the ghost realm—that blurry boundary between the living and the dead—for an unusually long time. His hospice worker, drawing from her experience with hundreds of deaths, had only seen this ability a few times in her career. Despite having never known my father, she declared with confidence, “He has unresolved issues and is unable to let go.” 

Eventually, though—nearly two months later—the hospice worker called to tell me that my father would most likely pass away that evening. I did not leave my phone on my nightstand before going to bed. Instead, I placed it in another room of the house—both unplugged and on silent mode—with a dangerously low battery level that I knew would drain away before morning. In my bedroom, I replaced the phone at my bedside with a bottle of pain medication and braced myself for the sightings. They came to me in the bright lights of cars that passed on the road in front of my house. Why are you not going to see him? The headlights shone through the trees swaying back and forth in the wind, scanning—like my optometrist’s beam of light to identify disease—the wall of my bedroom, searching for a sign—any sign, however infinitesimal—of compassion. When I could no longer see straight, I closed my curtains—or was it the window to my soul?—and slipped under the cold sheets of my bed. Whose bed was this really? Was it the thin mattress and iron frame of my dying father or was it my own deathbed? 

The sightings came at me so quickly then—all those ill- defined borders between life and death—that I could no longer regulate their flow. I could not possibly feel anything more, and so I closed my eyes and slept through five voicemail messages from the hospice worker. Early the next morning—while my nervous system fired off distress signals and my eyes flooded with fake tears—I listened to the first message informing me that my father had died. Each message thereafter—from that same disembodied voice—grew increasingly more demanding. 

Why are you not picking up the phone? 

MY FATHER DIED ALONE. He died on July 17, 2019—the same fateful day when General Francisco Franco led a military coup d’état that unleashed the Spanish Civil War in 1936—and so a smaller war of great pain and suffering was also unleashed within me. This strange day—the day of my father’s death—was somehow in another time and place from the rest of my life, the beginning of an endless flow of blood and tears in one country, and then—inexplicably—the end of my own ability to mourn. 

Sometimes I am able to convince myself that my parents felt too much love. Sometimes I really do believe that each one of their sensitive nervous systems was so overwhelmed with love that they simply could not function in a way that most people are able to care for others by attending the bedsides of the dying and mourning them at funerals. Perhaps my parents suffered from the same affliction that I also endure, relentless ghost sightings until they were so exhausted that all they could do was close the curtains and cover their eyes with something warm and soothing—anything that was close at hand, even a damp and dirty dish towel fallen on the floor—before slipping silently into bed. Sometimes I am able to convince myself that I also feel too much love. Sometimes I am certain that I feel nothing at all. Which is it then? 

Do I feel too much or not enough? Which lens is clearer? 

MY REMAINING TEARS are safely preserved in a small box of sacred relics, a reliquary. I place these relics—the real tears that I have hidden—below the eyes of the characters in Pablo Picasso’s Guernica. I place one tear beneath the lidless eyes of the bull—the Spanish state—that is condemned to stare endlessly at death from this single point in history. The bull turns away from the radiance of a single light bulb—the eye of God—that dangles from the dark ceiling of the painting. It refuses to mourn with the weeping woman, even though—mouth to mouth—they share the same breath. Both the woman and the bull will die—as do all humans and nations in the course of history—and so neither will be able to fully express the vastness of their emotions in time and space. Guernica, then—with its enormous canvas stretched like a burial cloth across its thin pine frame—is a shallow coffin for paupers; I am the poorest of them all, moving my tears wherever and whenever I please in the dark places of the painting. I press them against the cold faces of the dying, the weeping mother and her child with the light gone out from behind his eyes, but my tears seem to dry up wherever I place them. They curl and fall to the ground like torn pieces of paper. The wind blows them away. 

WHEN I RETURNED from viewing Guernica in Spain—the year when my father died and the edges of everything blurred— I struggled to answer basic questions that my optometrist asked me during his evaluation of my visual acuity. I was even uncertain how to answer my own questions about life and art. How do you best express your emotions? Through which lens? Which is sharper? I could say that I developed double vision. I could say that my body stopped producing normal tears, that my physical ability to express sadness was a gift of my youth and something that I never should have taken for granted. I could even say that the black-and-white images I saw during my exam were not the shivering characters that swayed back and forth on the eye chart, but the dying souls in Guernica. When my optometrist evaluates me now, though—years later in that same dark room with so many complex machines to accurately assess
how I view the world—and asks which lens is clearer—one or two?—life or art?—I can finally give him an answer. 

I DID NOT CRY when my father died. I went to the grocery store and purchased my tears, the ones with a built-in plastic applicator and extra protection for the most severe cases. The milky white solution—composed primarily of mineral oil with trace amounts of hydrochloric and boric acids added to balance pH levels and prevent infection—is manufactured in a sterile environment, poured into a 15-milliliter bottle, and packaged in a small cardboard box. The morning of my father’s death, though, these ingredients and the method in which they were assembled did not matter to me. I only wanted relief. The morning of my father’s death—at a time and place of my choosing, which happened to be behind the closed door of my bathroom—I carefully removed my eyeglasses. Then I took a long hard look at myself in the mirror, as I have done every morning since fleeing Spain, and wrung my dry eyes until they were so painfully twisted, I could not see straight. The tears would not fall—the ones that would drown every living thing on earth—and so I raised my head to heaven. Then I gently squeezed the plastic bottle of emollient and carefully placed a single tear—a single drop of ice-cold ecstasy— on the bone-dry surface of each of my eyes. In that fleeting moment—the millisecond between stimulus and response—I told myself that there was nothing more that I could do—but blink. Then I waited for the milky white solution—the swirling ghost of my father—to fade from my field of vision. 

♦ 

Jean McDonough is a school librarian who is working on a collection of nonfiction inspired by Pablo Picasso’s Guernica. Essays within this series have been published in journals such as Colorado Review, Water~Stone Review, and Catamaran. Several of her Guernica essays have also received writing awards, including finalist for Ruminate’s 2022 VanderMey Nonfiction Prize; notable in The Best American Essays, 2023; 2024 Pushcart Prize nominations, and selection in the forthcoming The Best of Delmarva Review, 2024.

The Delmarva Review, published in St. Michaels, MD, selects the most compelling new nonfiction, fiction, and poetry from thousands of submissions nationwide (and beyond) for publication in print, with an electronic edition. It is produced  at a time when many commercial  publications (and literary magazines) have closed their doors or are reducing literary content in print. Selection is based on writing quality, and almost half of the writers have come from the Chesapeake region.  As an independent literary publication, it has never charged writers a reading or publishing fee. The review is available worldwide from major online booksellers and specialty regional bookstores. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, support comes from tax-deductible contributions and a grant from Talbot Arts with funds from the Maryland State Arts Council. Website: www.DelmarvaReview.org

The Spy Newspapers may periodically employ the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the clarity and accuracy of our content.

Filed Under: 3 Top Story, Delmarva Review, Spy Journal

Next Page »

Copyright © 2025

Affiliated News

  • The Cambridge Spy
  • The Talbot Spy

Sections

  • Arts
  • Culture
  • Ecosystem
  • Education
  • Health
  • Local Life and Culture
  • Spy Senior Nation

Spy Community Media

  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Underwriting

Copyright © 2025 · Spy Community Media Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in