Frederick County Sheriff Chuck Jenkins testifies against a bill that would force his agency to cancel an agreement with Immigration and Customs Enforcement allowing the local department to enforce federal immigration law. (Photo by William J. Ford/Maryland Matters)
Supporters of a bill that would force sheriff’s departments to cancel agreements with federal immigration officials said deputies could still enforce the law just as effectively — they would just not be doing so as an extension of federal authorities.
“There are counties that do not have these formal agreements that still cooperate with ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement], still honor judicial warrants, still honor detainers when they are presented to them,” Del. Nicole Williams (D-Prince George’s) said Thursday during testimony for her bill, House Bill 1222.
The bill would prohibit local law enforcement agencies from entering into so-called 287(g) agreements that allow ICE to delegate some federal enforcement authorities to local officers, including the authority to arrest and check a person’s immigration status through a federal database. The bill also requires those departments that have 287(g) agreements to cancel them by July 1.
Six counties — Carroll, Cecil, Frederick, Garrett, Harford and Washington — currently have 287(g) agreements with ICE. Frederick and Harford sheriffs turned up at Thursday’s Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee hearing to defend the program.
“Please allow the local counties to provide public safety as they see fit,” Harford County Sheriff Jeffrey Gahler said.
Frederick County Sheriff Chuck Jenkins said his jurisdiction has been part of the 287(g) program since 2008 and “removed 1,795 criminals,” the majority of whom he described as “dangerous” and “violent.”
Del. Nicole Williams (D-Prince George’s) testifies on her bill to prohibit agreements between Immigration and Customs Enforcement and local police. (Photo by William J. Ford/Maryland Matters)Del. Nicole Williams (D-Prince George’s) testifies on her bill to prohibit agreements between Immigration and Customs Enforcement and local police. (Photo by William J. Ford/Maryland Matters)
Gahler noted that since his department signed a 287(g) agreement in 2014, ICE has chosen not to initiate action in 35% of cases there. He also pointed to the popularity of the agreements, citing a January poll by Annapolis-based Gonzales Research & Media that found 76% of people surveyed said they would support requiring local governments to cooperate with federal efforts to enforce immigration laws.
But opponents of the agreements say 287(g) agreements “significantly undermined any trust in law enforcement” in immigrant communities.
“287(g) agreements literally turn local law enforcement into ICE agents,” said Nicholas Katz, general counsel for the nonprofit immigrant-rights organization CASA, based in Prince George’s County.
“In this moment, Black and brown families don’t know if it’s safe to go to work, if its safe to walk their kids to school, if it’s safe to go to the hospital,” Katz said.
Currently, jail staff in a jurisdiction can check for any immigration enforcement actions against inmates. If there is a detainer, local officials will notify the agency that’s under the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Under Williams’ bill, which passed the House 98-38 last week, if federal authorities identify an immigrant who’s been convicted and is being held in a local jail, the local officials would have to give ICE at least 48 hours notice before release of the inmate. They would have to turn the immigrant over when federal authorities arrived.
At Thursday’s hearing, Sen. Chris West (R-Baltimore County) said the sheriffs would continue to do their job protecting the public, but asked if not having the 287(g) program would decrease their public safety work. It would, Gahler said.
“If we lose the ability to have these agreements with ICE, we lose what comes along with it,” Gahler said. “Which is finding out whether these people are indeed in the country illegally, and recommendations from ICE in relation to national security.”
Sen. William C. Smith Jr. (D-Montgomery), chair of the committee, said he understood the perspectives from supporters and opponents of the bill. But he acknowledged “there is a distinct fear” under the administration of President Donald Trump (R), who has made an immigration crackdown a key element of his tenure. The 287(g) program began under former President Bill Clinton (D) in the 1990s.
“I guess our policy debate here is centered on the federal prerogatives and their implementation of deportation policy and the existence of 287(g) in Maryland,” Smith said.
“Is that creating such an atmosphere that people are not going to want to cooperate with law enforcement? Live life?” he asked. “Is that something that is beneficial to keeping the 287(g) program or getting rid of it?”
by William J. Ford, Maryland Matters
March 28, 2025
Maryland Matters is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Maryland Matters maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Steve Crane for questions: [email protected].
Timothy Sullivan says
I’m waiting to see what the politician’s do when after having passed bill 287g, if one of them or family members is attacked by one of these illegal gang members. I’m sure they will change their tune. But it may be too late. What do you say to Rachael Morin’s family? What if it were a member of the Governor’s family?
Hopefully the residents of Maryland will wake up and vote you out at the next election.
President Trump also needs to stop all your Federal Funding with no chance of recovering it. Maybe the Governor and his cohorts will learn a hard lesson and the taxpayers will also wake up to all the nonsense.
Deirdre LaMotte says
Not responding to your hyperbole, perhaps you would agree due process is the democratic way to
treat anyone in this nation.
If not. We do not have a nation nor a democracy.
Trump at the moment is fixating on “numbers” not illegality. Fear is also a wise way to control
poorly informed citizens.
Patty Heaps says
Cry me a river! Citizens, poorly informed or not, have no “fear” of deportation – only those who entered illegally and continue to live here without documentation. I taught in the school attended by two of Rachel Morin’s children. I’ve seen what an influx of illegals can do to a school and a community . This nation endured four years of open borders and witnessed multiple crimes because of that policy, extending well beyond “just a few apartment complexes”. The argument of how long one has been living here illegally is meaningless – seems many of them have done nothing to acquire citizenship but then, that’s not part of the narrative. Read the room. People have had enough.